When oil is spilled, the response team must be fast and decisive. In this section you'll find out how decisions are made, and how oil is cleaned up and recovered.
In Canada, the party that causes pollution damage is responsible for paying the costs of clean-up and any resulting economic losses for environmental damages.
Some people have recommended registering each cargo load, so that its chemical "fingerprint" is recorded. This way, if a spill occurs and a unique blend of hydrocarbons is found in the water, the polluter can be identified and taken to court. If found guilty, the polluter would have to pay for the damage.
Once a spill is discovered, the senior employee at the site is informed, and he or she reports the spill to the government authority (or authorities) named in the contingency plan. Then the government authority sends a representative to monitor the clean-up and ensures it is done adequately. Depending on the seriousness and location of the spill, the polluter may be assisted by one or more levels of government. International assistance may be requested when it is needed, or when the spill affects another country.
The potential impacts of the spill are evaluated and workers begin trying to control it as quickly as possible. Once the leakage has been stopped, the team concentrates on containing the oil. If necessary, the team leader will set priorities for "booming". As much of the oil is recovered as possible. The next step is to clean up the affected area and dispose of oil and debris.
The response team depends on weather reports to provide information that is essential for tracking, containing and cleaning up a spill. The location of the accident, the season, the time of day, and the type of response actions planned will influence what information is useful. Decisions on which clean-up and containment methods to use depend on present and forecast weather conditions at the spill site. Meteorologists provide:
When oil is spilled, it is essential to track it and forecast where it is going. The main technique for spotting oil is observation by trained personnel from a low-flying plane or helicopter. Unfortunately, this is not always easy. Cloud shadows, wind patterns on the water and seaweed can be mistaken for oil slicks. Fog and cloudy weather make oil slicks hard to see. Visual observation is not possible during storms or at night.
There are other methods. Tools include cameras that are sensitive to ultraviolet and infrared light (light wavelengths that are beyond our range of vision). Computerized tracking and dispersion simulation models are often used to locate and follow spills. A number of other high technology techniques like radar, microwave and laser-induced fluorescence are also being tested for spill surveillance. Tracking buoys are sometimes used - the buoys drift with the oil and transmit their location by radio or by satellite.
Traditionally, oil booms could not be used in currents over 1.0 knot because oil would escape under the boom. However, new boom technologies allow oil booms to be used in relatively calm waters without any oil escaping.
By containing or diverting it. This prevents spreading, so that a smaller area is affected and clean-up is easier. It also keeps oil from highly sensitive areas that are quickly damaged.
Floating Booms
Sorbent Booms and Barriers
Once the oil is contained, it must be recovered from the water's surface. Equipment and people are quickly put to work. Here's how.
Skimmers
Sweep System
Sorbents
Manual Recovery

When oil is spilled on water, some of it often reaches the shoreline. Shoreline clean-up can be very difficult and time-consuming. It is often impossible to protect all shoreline areas from oil contamination so priority is assigned to the most sensitive areas.
Large waves crashing onto rocks and cliffs can remove and disperse oil naturally. These areas are generally left alone. Also, particularly sensitive areas like marshes are often better left alone once contaminated, since clean-up operations can cause more damage than if the oil were left to degrade naturally. Walking on marshes drives the oil deeper; when they have to enter a marsh, clean-up crews often put boards down to spread their weight, or use flat-bottom boats.
Shoreline clean-up often involves many people using simple hand tools such as rakes, shovels, wheelbarrows and garbage bags, high- and low-pressure hoses and sorbent materials to soak up the oil. Although these methods are very simple, they are often the most effective. Clean-up must be done carefully. Some experts believe that much of the biological damage observed on Alaskan beaches after the Exxon Valdez spill was caused by clean-up activities.
The method of clean-up that is most appropriate will depend on the type of shoreline and its biological resources.
Chemical and Hydraulic Dispersion
High-pressure water hoses
Steam Cleaning
Removal
Two things - the water is separated from the oil, and the oil is disposed of along with any remaining sorbent materials and other debris.
Separation
Disposal
Sometimes, particularly in stormy weather, oil cannot be recovered. This can be a problem, but under some circumstances it is actually a solution. High waves, as in the 1993 Braer spill, can break up the oil, mixing it into the water and dispersing it into the water column. Natural processes such as oxidation and bio-degradation eventually reduce the oil to its basic components.
Chemical Dispersants
In-situ Burning
In three situations:
Canada has skilled emergency groups that work quickly to rescue the wildlife affected by an oil spill. However, cleaning wildlife is a lot of work, is expensive, and is usually ineffective. Even if an oil spill is small, it can have a dramatic impact on bird and animal populations.
The success of clean-up operations has a lot to do with where a spill happens. If oil is spilled in an enclosed area like a harbour, the area can usually be well cleaned. If oil is spilled in an exposed area or in the open ocean, crews have a difficult time controlling the oil during times of adverse weather conditions. This usually means that clean-up efforts are less successful.